Press Release
2008 will be year in which social
innovation brings CSR into mainstream
corporate culture
INDONESIA (11 Jan 2008): Jude Mannion, CEO of Robin
Hood Asia — an organization dedicated to helping businesses
innovate into poverty — predicts 2008 will
be a watershed year for the corporate social responsibility
(CSR) movement. It will be a year in which social
innovation brings CSR into mainstream corporate culture.
According to Mannion, over the past decade, the business
community has wrestled with how to define a compelling
business case for a more strategic, meaningful engagement
in social and environmental issues. For the vast majority
of businesses, their 'benevolent' instincts have supported
a raft of philanthropic programs and other social
initiatives, which have been run out of corporate
foundations or CSR or communications departments.
Only now are businesses recognizing that an integrated,
strategic approach can deliver huge social benefits
while improving a company's bottom line and corporate
reputation. Companies can become true change agents
for social good by adapting their products, services
and business practices to a compelling social stand,
but only if these are intrinsically linked to one's
underlying business purpose. In so doing, they also
create unique social capital for their brands.
In the absence of any input from the business side,
a company's social initiatives run the risk of being
sidelined or becoming chairman's choice projects that
may wither away during management changeovers. Furthermore,
the great pool of corporate talent, skills, expertise
and creativity often resides within business operations.
Engaging these individuals in developing and implementing
social initiatives helps to ensure that these projects
reach their full potential.
In a recent contribution to The Global Compact's
Compact Quarterly (Dec 2007), Patrick
Cescau, Group Chief Executive of Unilever, stated:
“…for the majority of multinational companies, simply
making philanthropic donations in return for intangible
corporate reputation benefits is no longer enough.
This type of support is neither sustainable nor scalable.
Crucially, it fails to capitalize on the specific
skills and capabilities that business can bring to
bear in working with the public sector to tackle social
and environmental challenges.”
Robin Hood Asia is currently working with Unilever
in Indonesia to build upon the company's record
of success in bridging the traditional gap between
business and the social sector.
Mannion says it makes sense that the next social
innovations addressing poverty will come from businesses
in Asia like Unilever. 2.8 billion Asians earn less
than $3,000 a year and 57% earn less than $2 a day.
The business case for helping those in poverty is,
therefore, compelling. “Those living at the bottom
of the economic pyramid represent a multi-trillion
dollar market opportunity. It is eminently good business
to provide low-income populations with access to basic
goods and services and jobs.”
The problem that has hindered progress so far this
decade, she claims, is that each actor in the CSR
field — whether business or government or NGOs — has
a different worldview and their varying experiences
and perceptions of how business can address poverty
issues often conflict.
Nevertheless, the amount of daily media dialogue
highlighting the plight of the poor around the world
has created an environment in which business is beginning
to address this topic in its mainstream business agenda
rather than leaving it sitting on the sidelines of
business goals.
Whatever social stand and direction a company chooses,
the evidence to date is incontrovertible — true
social innovation is good for business. |